kimberkit: (Default)
Setting: dinnertime in the Kim-and-Neil household.

Ring ring!
Me to Neil: Grrr. Probably a parent. Can you pick up?

Neil, picking up the phone: (pausing) Okay, can I ask what this is about?

Neil hands the phone over to me, looking sheepish. Clearly caller hasn't passed a really good anti-annoyance check.

Me: Hello?

Caller: Hi, this is Tammi with the Dove Foundation. This call will only take 90 seconds of your time.

Me: (sighing internally) Okay.

Caller: Public surveys of parents and grandparents of children indicate that TV and movie ratings are becoming more lenient. What do you think?

Me: I'm not a parent. And I don't watch television.
(Note: except on DVD)

Caller: It doesn't matter. Hollywood controls most of the production for family feature films, and I'd like to know if you think that more funding should go towards movies that actual families can watch.

Me: I like dirty movies.

Caller: Well, but if you liked movies for families, don't you think more funding should go towards family feature films?

Me: What the heck do you mean, "family feature film"?

Caller: Such films as [no name movie] [no name movie] [no name movie]. These films were marketed directly to the public with no advertising money. Do you think I can call you back with your opinion at a later time?

So, apparently she wants me to fund unpopular movies that aren't good enough to have made Sundance (or I would've heard of them). Probably conservative movies.

Me: Um... no.

Click.

I am a "family feature film"'s worst nightmare. At least as they define "family." I mean, I liked Shrek and Cars and Toy Story and all sorts of violent family feature films.

Profile

kimberkit: (Default)
kimberkit

March 2012

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25 262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 12:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios